Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘PARDON’

President Elect Barack Obama intends to nominate Eric Holder to be Attorney General, which has caused a re-examination of former President Clinton’s pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich.

Today, former Attorney General William Barr under President George H.W. Bush, in an interview on MSNBC, stated that the power to pardon is in the Office of the President of the United States.

What President has the power to pardon?

What does this Constitution say about it?  Article II Section 2 Clause:  “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when call into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opiniion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.”  

The students who have paid me to teach them the true meaning of the Constitution know that the Office of President of the United States is a different Office from the Office of President.  Freedom is not free, so they have willingly paid to learn the truth that will make them free.  For those reading this, who are not my students this is an opportunity to learn the inner workings of the Constitution.

Former Attorney General Barr says the power to pardon is in the President of the United States.  If that is so, where in the Constitution does it state that the Office of President of the United States is the same as the Office of President?   

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Two Border Patrol Agents named Jose Campeon and Ignacio Ramos were in the news today.  They were trying to get a female United States district court judge to reduce a mandatory ten year prison sentence for using a firearm in the commission of a felony.  She turned them down.

The news people report that they are next going to try getting a Presidential pardon from the new President.   Just in case you haven’t  heard Lou Dobbs bemoan the fate of these two guys, the United States Government charged them by a grand jury indictment with shooting an unarmed drug smuggler in the butt.  The two had a jury trial and were convicted.

How do you defend yourself in the so-called federal court?  The first thing you do is challenge the qualifications of the grand jury.  Grand and petit jurors in United States district court must be U.S. citizens and residents of the judicial district for one year.

Just for the purposes of our discussion of what Ramos and Campeon should have done once they were charged, how would you prove you were a citizen of the United States.  Barack Obama can’t prove he is a natural born Citizen and he has a birth certificate that says he was born in Hawaii.  If you think it is easy to prove U.S. citizenship, you haven’t read enough of these posts.

Proving that you, as a juror, are a resident of  the judicial district is nearly an impossibility.  You aren’t hardly anyone is outside Washington D.C.  The judicial district is the government owned territory within the county or the state.  The only people who live in those places are military personnel and forest rangers. 

Back in the bad old days of racial discrimination, women and minorities were never allowed to be seated on grand juries and trial (petit) juries.  Grand and petit juries were challenged on racial grounds, but no one had ever challenged a grand or petit jury on territorial jurisdictiion grounds. 

The territorial jurisdiction of the United States district is limited to government territory.  If the government doesnt own it and control it, it isn’t the  United States.

How does this keep you out of federal prison?  You cannot be indicted, if not enough of the jurors who voted for the indictment qualify as U.S. citizens and as residents of the district.

The Supreme Territorial Court has confirmed the absolute right to challenge the grand jury in a case called Test v. United STates, 420 U.S. 28 (1975).   I tried to help Martha Stewart attack her conviction, but she may have used this information to secure some other benefit from the government by surrendering and doing her time without much fuss.  Martha Stewart could have easily challenged the trial jurors on their residency within the judicial district, because they appeared on national television to talk about the case.  Of course, any detective could place the trial jurors outside of government territory and outside the judicial district.   

Help Ramos and Campeon to get out of federal prison and you can help anyone  get out.                                       

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Read Full Post »